You are the owner of this page.
A1 A1
featured top story
Brattleboro gathering on mental health a blend of protest and pride

BRATTLEBORO — This Saturday, people with mental health conditions will gather as the annual Vermont Mad Pride celebration is held in Brattleboro for the first time.

The event is organized by Vermont Psychiatric Survivors Inc., as well as the Brattleboro-based Hive Mutual Support Network and a committee of volunteers, according to a news release. Vermont Psychiatric Survivors is a nonprofit advocacy organization with offices in Brattleboro and Rutland that provides support for people who have psychiatric disorders or have experienced coercive psychiatric treatment.

Mad Pride traces its roots to the 1990s, when marches were held in Toronto to protest housing discrimination against people with psychiatric histories, according to Kaz DeWolfe, communications coordinator for the Vermont organization. Since then, similar events have been held across the country and the world, and the Green Mountain State’s iteration is one of just a few — if not the only — in New England, DeWolfe said.

“A lot of Mad Pride activists, rather than pathologizing and demonizing all of the things about us that are in our diagnoses, we find pride in those things, and we feel pride in our reactions to trauma, pride in our experiences,” DeWolfe explained.

For the first three years, Vermont’s event was held in Montpelier, DeWolfe said. This year’s will begin with a march from Pliny Park to the Brattleboro commons, where there will be a rally with guest speakers, music and an open mic session. The first 100 people to arrive will receive a free Mad Pride T-shirt, and there will also be free pizza available, according to DeWolfe.

The goal of the event is not only to show pride, but also to speak out against discrimination, coerced treatment and forced institutionalization, DeWolfe said.

“It’s a celebration of our community and our gifts and strengths, and also a protest of the mistreatment that we experience,” DeWolfe said.

The afternoon’s keynote speaker will be Shain Neumeier, a disability rights lawyer and activist based in Northampton, Mass. Neumeier will speak about personal experiences representing people who have been involuntarily committed, abused or neglected in a facility.

“I think that even though it’s not as bad as it was a few years ago for instance, there’s still a perception that people with psych disabilities or developmental disabilities, etc., are dangerous, and that coercive care would be not only humane but beneficial to society as well,” Neumeier said.

Neumeier emphasized that the movement’s intention is not to discourage people from seeking out help, but said forcing someone into treatment can deter them from doing so.

“A lot of people do rely on treatments, and that’s not a bad thing. But it has to be from our choice,” Neumeier said.

Mad Pride is a way to raise awareness of the challenges people with psychiatric conditions face, and it can also be an opportunity to connect people with resources to find support on their own terms, DeWolfe noted.

About one in five Americans experiences some form of mental illness in a given year, according to the National Alliance on Mental Illness.

“I think that we’re a community that people like to pretend that we don’t exist. There’s a huge history going back centuries of ‘mad’ folks being locked away and hidden out of sight,” DeWolfe said. “And so I think getting out and being visible is this liberatory act that we can participate in.”

Vermont Mad Pride is scheduled for Saturday from noon to 4 p.m. starting in Pliny Park and moving to the commons. Additional information about Vermont Psychiatric Survivors, Inc. is available at

Every night is a home run derby in baseball this season

They were holding a Home Run Derby at Progressive Field on Monday night, the most extraneous one in the history of this annual, made-for-TV, night-before-the-All-Star-Game exhibition.

A sellout crowd packed the stadium, and millions were watching the telecast, hoping to see something extraordinary. But as one baseball after another sailed into the skies above Lake Erie, anyone who had paid attention to the first half of the 2019 season was asking this:

How, exactly, was this different from what we’ve been watching on a nightly basis all year?

In 2019, home runs are not a sideshow or an appetizer to the main course. They are the main course. With all due respect to the Los Angeles Dodgers’ blistering pace, the New York Yankees’ injury-riddled rise, the dearth of quality relief pitching, Mike Trout’s continued greatness and Bryce Harper’s strikeout binge, the dominant storyline of baseball’s first half — by far — is the unprecedented rate at which baseballs are leaving the stadium.

With 3,691 home runs hit in the first half of 2019, the game is on pace to see its single-season record shattered — by a lot. The current pace of 1.37 homers per team game translates to 6,668 over a full season — 563 more than in 2017, when a record 6,105 were hit. That’s like taking the most homers ever witnessed in one season and adding almost eight 2001 Barry Bondses to it.

“There’s obviously something going on,” Los Angeles Dodgers left-hander Clayton Kershaw, who has contributed 13 gopher balls to this year’s major league total, said Monday, the eve of the All-Star Game. “I don’t know if it’s a good or a bad thing, but they’re flying out of there — I can tell you from experience.”

Even the raw accounting of league-wide totals doesn’t do justice to the astounding rate of long balls across the game. But maybe this will: Only six teams have ever hit 250 or more homers in a single season, led by the Yankees’ 267 last year. But this year, no fewer than 10 teams are on pace to reach or surpass the 250 milestone, and the Minnesota Twins are on pace to hit a staggering 302.

“At our stadium, guys are hitting them almost out of the stadium,” Texas Rangers lefty Mike Minor said. “The ball is just flying. Every series it seems like someone hits one where you’re like, ‘Huh?’ “

Home runs, with their massive gravitational pull, are like baseball’s equivalent of a black hole, pulling in and vaporizing everything else in its force field, leaving behind a grotesque, distorted version of the game. Home runs have accounted for 15.9 percent of all hits this season, up from 11.6 percent a decade ago and 8.5 percent 30 years ago.

“The milestone marks, the historic records that seem to be so celebrated across our game — you just wonder if those get tainted as guys chase down some of those records,” Max Scherzer, the Washington Nationals’ ace, said Monday.

While fans oohed and aahed over the titanic moon shots off the bats of the derby participants Monday night, they could have just attended virtually any major league game this season to witness the same spectacle. In 2018, there were 82 home runs estimated at 450 feet or more, per Statcast tracking data. This year, there have already been 100. Fly balls are turning into homers at a rate of 15.1 percent in 2019, up from 9.4 percent at the beginning of this decade.

“If the balls are flying 25 feet further this year, I’m glad they’re not just doing that when I’m pitching,” Chicago White Sox ace Lucas Giolito said. “It’s that way for everybody.”

It is when you begin asking the critical question — Why is this happening? — that everyone seems to get a little squirrelly.

“Guys are throwing harder and with more spin,” Dodgers right-hander Walker Buehler said. “When you spin a ball more, it’s going to travel farther when it gets hit.”

“They’re putting guys in the big leagues now who can hit home runs,” Houston Astros third baseman Alex Bregman said. “In the past, the seven, eight and nine hitters would put the ball in play, go line to line and just get hits. And now, one through nine has the power to leave the yard.”

“Guys are throwing more fastballs up in the zone now, (as a counter to) the launch-angle movement or whatever,” Detroit Tigers closer Shane Greene said. “More (batters) have holes up in the zone, and with analytics you can pinpoint that hole. But if you miss your spot up there, it’s going to get hit out of the park.”

“A lot of guys are throwing a lot harder,” said Trout, the Los Angeles Angels’ two-time MVP. “When I first came up, (most pitchers were throwing) 90 to 93 (mph), and there was maybe that one guy in the bullpen who could throw 100. Now there’s multiple guys.”

But by this point, there is little doubt that a change in the aerodynamic properties of the baseball is driving the home run surge. Even if the visual evidence isn’t overwhelming, many pitchers have reported a different feel to the 2019 baseball, Commissioner Rob Manfred has acknowledged a reduction to the ball’s drag coefficient, and a Harvard-educated former astrophysicist has proved more or less definitively that the ball’s physical properties have changed this year.

In a piece for The Athletic, Meredith Wills concluded that the ball’s seams are “demonstrably lower” this year, creating a rounder, more aerodynamic ball with less drag.

“Our scientists ... have told us that this year the baseball has a little less drag,” Manfred told ESPN Radio on Monday. “It doesn’t need to change very much in order to produce meaningful change in terms of the way the game is played on the field. We are trying to understand exactly why that happened and build out a manufacturing process that gives us a little more control. (But) our baseball is a handmade product, and there is going to be variation year to year.”

Chicago Cubs manager Joe Maddon, after witnessing baseballs ricocheting off bats as if they were golf balls, told reporters Sunday, “You could have just stamped ‘Titleist’ on the sides of these things.”

Astros ace Justin Verlander, an outspoken critic of so-called “juiced” balls since 2017, has again led the charge in 2019. Verlander, who will start tonight’s All-Star Game for the American League, told ESPN on Monday: “Major League Baseball’s turning this game into a joke. ... We all know what happened. Manfred (said), ‘We want more offense.’ All of a sudden, the balls are juiced? It’s not coincidence. We’re not idiots.”

But whatever alteration is ultimately made to restore some equilibrium to the game, via the baseball itself, it is unlikely to happen before the end of 2019. Which leaves the question of just how crazy this season is going to get. This May, batters hit 1,135 homers, the most ever for a month in the sport’s history — a record that lasted only a month, when hitters bashed 1,142 in June. There’s plenty of July and all of August, hotter months when home run rates traditionally soar, still to come.

Now, the parents of Newtown are fighting back

NEWTOWN, Conn. — It was just weeks after 26 people were gunned down at Sandy Hook Elementary School when Lenny Pozner first saw people speculating online that the rampage had been staged, with crisis actors responding to a fake attack.

His 6-year-old son, Noah Pozner, who had gone to school that morning in a Batman sweatshirt, was one of the 20 children killed in Newton, Conn.

Before the funerals had even concluded, an online conspiracy theory mad targets of grieving family members. Strangers hurled insults at Pozner, asking how much he got paid to play his part in the government-sponsored hoax. They used photos of his son, with his tousled brown hair and round cheeks, on websites claiming the shooting was faked to generate urgency for gun-control laws. Then came the death threats.

It was the stuff of madness. But in a time of madness — in a world in which science can be dismissed as political ploy and videos might reflect truth or fabrication — Pozner found himself having to fight to prove, over and over, that his son had lived, and his son had died.

June marked a turning point: He won a lawsuit against the editors of a book that claimed no one was killed in the attack. A Wisconsin judge issued a summary judgment against James H. Fetzer and Mike Palecek, finding they defamed Pozner with statements that his son’s death certificate was a ruse.

In a separate settlement, the book’s publisher agreed to stop selling it.

Pozner has been trying to reclaim his son’s history for years.

To combat the hoaxers, he has used earnest pleas, official complaints, rhetoric, lawsuits. He and volunteers from the HONR Network, a nonprofit organization he founded to combat the harassment, have challenged targets obscure and gargantuan, from lone conspiracy theorists to companies as powerful as Google.

Increasingly, families of others killed at Sandy Hook have started fighting back publicly. Relatives and prosecutors have brought at least nine cases against hoaxers, according to an attorney for a group of plaintiffs, including three in Connecticut consolidated by the court. In recent months, family members have started seeing real gains in a fight most were reluctant to wage.

In Connecticut, there was a turning point, too, with a judge imposing sanctions on Alex Jones, who runs the conspiracy-driven Infowars website, and agreeing to a trial in a defamation case.

Litigation is incredibly invasive and inconvenient and expensive, said Jake Zimmerman, an attorney for Pozner. It can also be a powerful weapon against rumor and innuendo, with rules of evidence and civil procedure built over hundreds of years.

“You have to rely on documents instead of things like hearsay,” he said.

They handed the judge in the Wisconsin case Noah Pozner’s death certificate, with its raised seal, to disprove the allegation in the book that images of the certificate had been altered or faked.

They turned over 70 pages of pediatric medical records.

They asked the court to appoint an independent expert to compare a sample of Lenny Pozner’s DNA with a sample, obtained from the medical examiner, of Noah Pozner’s DNA.

“Unimpeded conspiracy theories distort truth and erase history,” Pozner said afterward. “They dehumanize victims. People like Fetzer who hide behind their computer screen and terrorize people grappling with the most unimagined grief, were put on notice,” he said, as were social media companies that allow their platforms to be weaponized.

Fetzer told The Washington Post in an email he was dumbfounded by the ruling in Wisconsin. “The decision by the Court was improper on multiple grounds and I am going to do whatever I can to correct the record. The American public has been played by one fake event after another and deserves to know the truth,” Fetzer wrote.

The lawsuit against him was never about defamation, Fetzer wrote online, “but about suppressing freedom of speech and freedom of the press. The Deep State does not want the American people to grasp the extent to which they have been bamboozled by their own government.”

In three cases against Jones in Texas — including one brought by Pozner and Noah’s mother, Veronique De La Rosa — Mark Bankston, an attorney for the parents, said Jones’ obsession with Sandy Hook had created “a seven-year open wound” for the families.

In one case, Neil Heslin sued Jones and other defendants for defamation in 2017 for statements made on Jones’ Infowars website that Heslin was lying when he recalled holding his son’s body after the shooting.

In another, Scarlett Lewis seeks damages because of the false narrative promoted on Infowars, with stories mocking her and other parents of victims as liars.

De La Rosa and Pozner’s case accuses Jones of defamation and intentional infliction of emotional distress — for harassing families for years and for claiming De La Rosa was an actor in a faked interview on CNN about the shooting.

A judge has denied motions to dismiss the cases brought by Heslin, De La Rosa, and Lewis, and the defendants have appealed those decisions.

Robert Barnes, an attorney for Jones in the Texas cases, said they could prove precedent-setting, raising important First Amendment issues.

“Is emotional harm more important to protect than free speech?” Barnes said. “We believe protecting speech matters more than emotional safety.”

The shooting happened on a Friday. By Sunday, Robbie Parker, whose 6-year-old daughter, Emilie, was killed in the attack, knew there were videos accusing him of being a crisis actor, because people were posting them on a social media page that friends created as a memorial to Emilie.

The page was quickly inundated. Parker was getting emails to his personal and work addresses. By the time of Emilie’s funeral, he had already been threatened.

The conspiracy theories affected much of Newtown. The school board and other agencies received relentless demands for public records. FBI agents, emergency workers and others were accused of participating in the hoax. Strangers were showing up in town and videotaping children.

At first, Parker was confused, assuming the wild theories would quickly subside. He didn’t realize how social media would fuel those ideas and sustain them, providing a shroud of anonymity and making it easy for ideas to go viral. “They were able to do a lot of really harmful things with no understanding of the consequences of it and without any threat of being held responsible,” he said.

Years later and thousands of miles from Newtown, he was walking toward a hotel in Seattle when a stranger stopped him and began yelling and cursing about a hoax.

Parker thought he had composed himself — and made sure the man was no longer following him — before he went tothe hotel room where he, his wife and young daughters were staying. But as soon as his wife saw his face, he broke down, hyperventilating and crying, he said. They closed themselves in the bathroom to talk about what had happened and how to explain it to their daughters.

It wasn’t until the 2018 shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Fla., that the path forward became clear.

A friend asked Parker to talk to parents whose daughter had died in the Florida shooting. The mother, in shock, told him people were harassing the victims’ families in Parkland and claiming no one had died.

That’s when he realized, he said, that a lawsuit might not only help protect the memory of his daughter and keep his family safe, but also prevent other families from being victimized anew.

The Newtown families were bewildered at first, said Chris Mattei, an attorney for those families. Then many hoped it would fade away. Instead, it intensified, he said, inflamed by Jones’s enormous public platform on Infowars. The families’ lawsuit filed in Connecticut argues that the stories Jones promotes are designed to create an audience and a market for his retail store that sells nutritional supplements and other items.

The case was brought by eight families of people killed at Sandy Hook and an FBI agent who responded to the scene. It was filed against Jones, several corporate entities, a conspiracy theorist who has been a guest on Infowars and his associate.

In June, Superior Court Judge Barbara Bellis in Connecticut imposed sanctions on Jones, citing two reasons. First, she said his legal team failed to produce several documents, despite repeated orders that they be provided. Second, the judge referenced what she described as a 20-minute “deliberate tirade and harassment and intimidation” on Jones’ broadcast about the lawsuit, Mattei and the discovery of child pornography that had been included in electronic documents Jones’ attorneys submitted.

Bellis criticized the defendants’ delays in producing documents, and noted that electronic records, when provided to the court, included images of child pornography.

She took sharp exception to Jones’ response to that on Infowars.

If Jones believed those images were planted in an attempt to frame him, she wrote, he should have alerted authorities and filed a motion alerting the court; his lawyers could have asked the lawsuit to be dismissed for that reason.

“What is not appropriate,” Bellis wrote, “what is indefensible, unconscionable, despicable, and possibly criminal behavior is to accuse opposing counsel, through a broadcast, no less, of planting child pornography, which is a serious felony.”

Bellis ordered Jones to pay some of the plaintiffs’ legal fees as part of the sanction and toldthe defendants they could not pursue a motion to dismiss. She set a trial date for November 2020.

Jones’ attorneys have asked the Connecticut Supreme Court to review Bellis’ decision.

Norm Pattis, an attorney for Jones, said an important principle is at stake in the case.

“Our contention is he violated no law in offering the opinions he did. To silence him because his views were unpopular might be easy in this case, given the public sympathy for Sandy Hook families,” Pattis said, but that could erode First Amendment protections. “Defending Mr. Jones’ right to speak involves defending all of our right to speak.”

Jones no longer doubts the shootings took place but had the right to ask questions about what happened, Pattis said.

People turn to Jones because a crisis of legitimacy afflicts the country, Pattis said, with suspicions about information from the government and the media.

“People don’t know who to believe,” Pattis said.

The rumors continue to spread. In late June, Parker’s sister called in tears because someone was sending her social media messages with links to videos, demanding to know why her brother had participated in a hoax.

When he thinks about Emilie and the other victims, Parker said, he thinks of “just how innocent and beautiful and loving they were. For their memories and their lives to be tarnished and to be used in this way is one of the most -”

The tragedy isn’t just that their lives were cut short, he said. Their lives also have been redefined by strangers.

Even in those first weeks and months after the shooting, in a haze of grief and shock, Pozner knew what was happening online. He had seen conspiracy theories grow and spiral online, drawing in the curious and the skeptical. He didn’t know yet what it was to be trapped in one.

He sent an email to Jones: “Haven’t we had our share of pain and suffering?”

In the wrenching, chaotic year that followed, he knew the lies continued, but he had no emotional bandwidth to respond. Bit by bit, he started to try to reclaim the truth. He posted photos of Noah, his mother and sisters. There he is, a chubby-cheeked little boy, splashing in a pool with floaties; curled up with his sisters listening to Pozner read; playing in the snow; eating a toffee apple; holding a bouquet of dandelions, beaming.

When people used the photos of Noah in blog posts claiming a hoax, Pozner and volunteers from the HONR Network asked that the pictures be removed, relying on copyright law when needed.

In December 2015, when President Donald Trump was campaigning for office, he praised Jones’ “amazing” reputation while appearing on his show.

That same month, De La Rosa and Pozner wrote an opinion piece in the South Florida Sun-Sentinel: It had been three years since their son died, they wrote, and people continued to badger them for proof of Noah’s existence.

They asked Florida Atlantic University officials to fire James Tracy, a professor who kept a blog with claims that the Newtown shooting had been staged.

They had filed a police report claiming harassment, they wrote, after Tracy sent a certified letter demanding proof they were Noah’s parents.

The university started termination proceedings against Tracy in January 2016.

That month, Pozner received threatening messages warning him death was imminent. “I was stunned,” he said. “I could hear her voice and the vitriol and hate in her words.”

In 2017, a Florida woman, Lucy Richards, was sentenced to five months in prison for making death threats against Pozner.

Pozner moves often and tries to keep his address secret.

Story by story, site by site, year after year, Pozner has been working to restore the truth about his son. If the hoax idea is a brush fire, he wants to control the burn — not extinguish it so no one can hear the idea, but limit its spread and destructiveness.

Book publisher David R. Gahary thought he knew all about Lenny Pozner, because of what he had read online.

He said his company, Wrongs Without Wremedies, was willing to publish the book “Nobody Died at Sandy Hook” because he doesn’t think anyone should have the right to tell people what they should read. There were anomalies in the scenes from the aftermath of Sandy Hook, he said, and it was an important event because of people’s distrust of the government.

On May 28 at a law firm in Madison, Wisc., Gahary sat at a table across from Pozner from 9 a.m. until after 6 p.m., as Pozner answered questions in a deposition.

The more he listened, he said, the more he thought Pozner was a normal person. Not a smooth talker. “Just a regular guy,” he said, “who’s telling the truth.”

At the end of the day, Gahary shook Pozner’s hand and apologized. He offered condolences for Noah’s death.

“Lenny Pozner was right,” Gahary said. “Real people are getting hurt.”